|
|
| Author |
Message |
zengrenouille
Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9038
|
 Posted: February 21, 2008 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GinnyX wrote: |
| The Wedding scene was my favorite part of the book, I think it would be awful for them to leave that out. |
They don't need to leave it out just because Fleur isn't in this movie. George and Fleur could fall in love. We don't have to see it happen. They might have it mentioned in this film. I'm really hoping for the wedding, too. They may just make it a Lupin/Tonks wedding, though.
_________________
 
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX
Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22292
|
| Posted: February 21, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
| The Wedding scene was my favorite part of the book, I think it would be awful for them to leave that out. |
They don't need to leave it out just because Fleur isn't in this movie. George and Fleur could fall in love. We don't have to see it happen. They might have it mentioned in this film. I'm really hoping for the wedding, too. They may just make it a Lupin/Tonks wedding, though. |
George and Fleur?
_________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Salazar Slytherin
Joined: Feb 3, 2008
Posts: 1927
|
| Posted: February 21, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now there's a weird pairing. 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GinnyX
Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22292
|
| Posted: February 21, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
Never happened.
George/GinnyX
_________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Salazar Slytherin
Joined: Feb 3, 2008
Posts: 1927
|
| Posted: February 21, 2008 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Take away the X and you have yourself a disturbing fanfic couple.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GinnyX
Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22292
|
| Posted: February 21, 2008 6:00 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
Oh the horrors! 
_________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Harry's_fan
Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Location: A Land Down Under
Posts: 765
|
| Posted: March 2, 2008 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm ok with them not being in this film, but they do need to be mentioned somehow.
There is also no need to have DH split into 2 movies, what a waste. That would ruin it as far as I'm concered. It can very well fit into a 3 hr film.
_________________
^Banner and avatar made by me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrAzYhArRyPoTtErNeRd62442
Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Location: somewhere in hogwarts mourning the deaths.
Posts: 209
|
| Posted: April 12, 2008 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
instead of having fluer in maybe they might just ron mentioning it a few times.
_________________
Put this on your sigi if you REFUSE TO BELIVE that Sirius Remus Tonks Lily James Dumbledore Fred Hedwig Dobby Colin are dead! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lilyevans
Joined: Apr 19, 2008
Posts: 1063
|
| Posted: April 19, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought so; she's just not really important. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Melancholia
Joined: May 5, 2008
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: May 5, 2008 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
but i guess Fleur, Bill should be in the DH film, at least in the scene of Harry moving to the Burrow, when Mad-Eye dies. how could that be shot without them?
_________________
Toujours Pur |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
barrytrotter
Joined: Mar 26, 2008
Location: In the Ford Anglia Production Centre
Posts: 77
|
| Posted: May 5, 2008 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
in my opinion, i think fleur is needed in the film, ok the role is not huge but it adds to the books, Ron thinking that molly invites tonks to push fleur away makes it better, the thing is, the producers want to make this film into the Harry/Ginny show, if they want to focus on relationships like the book does, they need to include, most aspects of the Tonks/Remus Bill/Fleur Ron/Lavender/Hermione Ginny/Dean. it adds to the feel of the book, yes i thought that the book was a bit too much in this respect, but it does continue into the 7th book, and it does make sense to make it so. At xmas in HBP, Ron watches Bill/Fleur to pick up "tips"for his relationship with lavender.
_________________
Member #3 of the "David Yates has no direction for the Potter films and should therefore be stoned" club!
http://www.harrypotterfanfiction.com/viewuser.php?showuid=140382
Wand:11", Ash, Phoenix tail feather
House: Gryffindor
Patronus: Dragon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Auror Monroe
Joined: Oct 2, 2007
Location: Ministry of Magic - Level 2: Auror Headquarters
Posts: 696
|
| Posted: May 5, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The fact of the matter is that no character should have ever been removed from any of the films. If they want to change the story line then fine but theres no reason they can't have the characters standing in the background of some scenes and possibly mention them.
I know they have the money to bring each actor back for each film and they shouldn't have a problem casting each and every part.
_________________
It's Not Over!
Length: 11 1/2 inches
Wood: Holly
Core: Dragon Heartstring |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bcarlos18
Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: May 26, 2008 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
i dont find clemence to be that beautiful.
they should have gotten another actress |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thcrazyauror93
Joined: Apr 24, 2008
Location: in your dreams as "Sugarraims"...
Posts: 1640
|
| Posted: June 13, 2008 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
groan, it's ashame that fleur's not gonna be in HPB!!!
i hope that she'll be in deathly hallows. it's so unfair the movie's story keeps on making the novel different. 
_________________
 Bill K.<3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pottergirl66
Joined: Mar 1, 2008
Location: somewhere with nathan. . .
Posts: 1862
|
| Posted: June 13, 2008 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Auror Monroe wrote: |
The fact of the matter is that no character should have ever been removed from any of the films. If they want to change the story line then fine but theres no reason they can't have the characters standing in the background of some scenes and possibly mention them.
I know they have the money to bring each actor back for each film and they shouldn't have a problem casting each and every part. |
you have a very good point, if they weren't so concerned about being a boxoffice hit, then they would spend the money needed to make this movie the best it could be
_________________
/\ thanks Kar!
call me Kimmy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Rules
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in
