|
|
| Author |
Message |
Dementemort


Joined: Nov 5, 2007
Posts: 21
|
Posted: December 24, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: Disarming |
|
|
| Why in this movie was expelliarmus portrayed as a blue blast? i thought it was a red jet of light. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loony's nargle repellent


Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Posts: 136
|
Posted: January 1, 2008 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dunno i thought stupify was red???? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iLoveEmma


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 15310
|
Posted: January 3, 2008 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
me too.... _________________
I Love Makenzie
They say money cant buy happiness, but it can sure as hell buy everything else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WTTHENINJA


Joined: Jul 27, 2007
Location: Using the waves of sound a true master paralyzes his oppent leaving him vunerable to attack
Posts: 12248
|
Posted: January 4, 2008 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
me three...... _________________
Peace is a lie... only passion
Threw passion I gain strength
Threw strength I gain power
Threw power I gain victory
Threw victory my chains r broken
OBAMA=BABY KILLER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EmzehP


Joined: Dec 21, 2007
Posts: 117
|
Posted: January 4, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wasnt Expeliarmus yellow?
Oh, im confuzzled...
But Stupefy is red, and AV is green... hehe _________________ Snape <3
Lupin <3
Love Always XD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jreyes130


Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 708
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
me four.... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zengrenouille


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9116
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stupefy is red.
Expelliarmus is scarlet:
Both of them swung their wands above their heads and pointed at their opponent; Snape cried: "Expelliarmus!" There was a dazzling flash of scarlet light and Lockhart was blasted off his feet: He flew backward off the stage, smashed into the wall, and slid dowm it to sprawl on the floor.
CoS, Charpter 11: The Dueling Club, Page 190, American Edition.
I assume that since there are only 7 colors in the spectrum, varying shadees of those seven colors are quite common. _________________

  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kwidditch


Joined: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 242
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But the spell had the wrong effect anyway (in CoS anyway) -- the whole point of the spell is for the opponent to lose his wand and Lockhart was just blasted down but his wand remained in his hand...  _________________ "It’s the unknown we fear when we look upon death and darkness, nothing more." -- Albus Dumbledore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zengrenouille


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9116
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kwidditch wrote: |
But the spell had the wrong effect anyway (in CoS anyway) -- the whole point of the spell is for the opponent to lose his wand and Lockhart was just blasted down but his wand remained in his hand...  |
No, he lost his wand. Further down the page Lackhart says this:
"Well, there you have it!" he said, tottering back onto the platform. "That was the Disarming Charm -- as you see, I've lost my wand -- ah, thank you, Miss Brown -- yes, an exellent idea to show them that, Professor Snape, but if you don't mind my saying so, it was very obvious what you were aout to do. I I had wanted to stop you it would have been only too easy -- however, I thought it would be instructive to let them see . . ."
I think that any curse, given with the right force and depending on the abilities of the receiving wizard, could knowck a wizard off of his feet. Snape, in his hate for Lockhart threw the curse hard. Lockhart, who is not a talented wizard in the least, received the blow worse than the average wizards would. That is my theory at least.[/i] _________________

  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX



Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22430
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kwidditch


Joined: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 242
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| kwidditch wrote: |
But the spell had the wrong effect anyway (in CoS anyway) -- the whole point of the spell is for the opponent to lose his wand and Lockhart was just blasted down but his wand remained in his hand...  |
No, he lost his wand. Further down the page Lackhart says this:
"Well, there you have it!" he said, tottering back onto the platform. "That was the Disarming Charm -- as you see, I've lost my wand -- ah, thank you, Miss Brown -- yes, an exellent idea to show them that, Professor Snape, but if you don't mind my saying so, it was very obvious what you were aout to do. I I had wanted to stop you it would have been only too easy -- however, I thought it would be instructive to let them see . . ."
I think that any curse, given with the right force and depending on the abilities of the receiving wizard, could knowck a wizard off of his feet. Snape, in his hate for Lockhart threw the curse hard. Lockhart, who is not a talented wizard in the least, received the blow worse than the average wizards would. That is my theory at least.[/i] |
I meant in the movie. In the book he obviously loses his wand -- as I said, that's the whole point of the spell.
And Ginny: notice when he falls down, the wand is still in his hand. _________________ "It’s the unknown we fear when we look upon death and darkness, nothing more." -- Albus Dumbledore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX



Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22430
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| kwidditch wrote: |
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| kwidditch wrote: |
But the spell had the wrong effect anyway (in CoS anyway) -- the whole point of the spell is for the opponent to lose his wand and Lockhart was just blasted down but his wand remained in his hand...  |
No, he lost his wand. Further down the page Lackhart says this:
"Well, there you have it!" he said, tottering back onto the platform. "That was the Disarming Charm -- as you see, I've lost my wand -- ah, thank you, Miss Brown -- yes, an exellent idea to show them that, Professor Snape, but if you don't mind my saying so, it was very obvious what you were aout to do. I I had wanted to stop you it would have been only too easy -- however, I thought it would be instructive to let them see . . ."
I think that any curse, given with the right force and depending on the abilities of the receiving wizard, could knowck a wizard off of his feet. Snape, in his hate for Lockhart threw the curse hard. Lockhart, who is not a talented wizard in the least, received the blow worse than the average wizards would. That is my theory at least.[/i] |
I meant in the movie. In the book he obviously loses his wand -- as I said, that's the whole point of the spell.
And Ginny: notice when he falls down, the wand is still in his hand. |
At about 1:24 Lockhart loses his wand. At about 1:25 you can actually see the wand in the air.
Go to exactly 1:29 and you will see he does not have his wand. _________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zengrenouille


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9116
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GinnyX wrote: |
At about 1:24 Lockhart loses his wand. At about 1:25 you can actually see the wand in the air.
Go to exactly 1:29 and you will see he does not have his wand. |
As Ginny said . . . He very clearly did not have his wand afet being struck. He had it back in his hand when he was walking back toward Snape, though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEPhYhKdJ7k _________________

  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX



Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22430
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
At about 1:24 Lockhart loses his wand. At about 1:25 you can actually see the wand in the air.
Go to exactly 1:29 and you will see he does not have his wand. |
As Ginny said . . . He very clearly did not have his wand afet being struck. He had it back in his hand when he was walking back toward Snape, though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEPhYhKdJ7k |
The camera turns to Hermione and teh boys. At that point Lockhart could have gotten his wand. _________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zengrenouille


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9116
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GinnyX wrote: |
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
At about 1:24 Lockhart loses his wand. At about 1:25 you can actually see the wand in the air.
Go to exactly 1:29 and you will see he does not have his wand. |
As Ginny said . . . He very clearly did not have his wand afet being struck. He had it back in his hand when he was walking back toward Snape, though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEPhYhKdJ7k |
The camera turns to Hermione and teh boys. At that point Lockhart could have gotten his wand. |
I know. I was just pointing out that he had it back when he was walking toward Snape . . . _________________

  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX



Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22430
|
Posted: April 7, 2008 9:39 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
At about 1:24 Lockhart loses his wand. At about 1:25 you can actually see the wand in the air.
Go to exactly 1:29 and you will see he does not have his wand. |
As Ginny said . . . He very clearly did not have his wand afet being struck. He had it back in his hand when he was walking back toward Snape, though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEPhYhKdJ7k |
The camera turns to Hermione and teh boys. At that point Lockhart could have gotten his wand. |
I know. I was just pointing out that he had it back when he was walking toward Snape . . . |
I just fet like I should thrown that in there in case any one did ask, which inevitably someone will. _________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kwidditch


Joined: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 242
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. Every time I watched the movie I wondered why he still had his wand, but now in this youtube clip I see he didn't. So I rechecked the DVD and it's now I see it's obvious that there's some kind of filming error:
As he flies through the air, the wand indeed leaves his hand. As he lands on the floor, the wand is in his hand! (you can't see it on the youtube clip because the sides of the screen are cut off). Then it flashes to the crowd, and when it flashes back to him, once again the wand is gone!
Check it out and confirm. If you can't see it, I'll put up a screenshot. _________________ "It’s the unknown we fear when we look upon death and darkness, nothing more." -- Albus Dumbledore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zengrenouille


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9116
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're right. It was in his hand when he landed. _________________

  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jreyes130


Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 708
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its as if zengrenouille is taking ginnys place _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX



Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22430
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| jreyes130 wrote: |
| its as if zengrenouille is taking ginnys place |
I'm irreplacable. _________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zengrenouille


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9116
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GinnyX wrote: |
| jreyes130 wrote: |
| its as if zengrenouille is taking ginnys place |
I'm irreplacable. |
lol, that is true. I'm not taking her place, but teaming up with her.  _________________

  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jreyes130


Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 708
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
| jreyes130 wrote: |
| its as if zengrenouille is taking ginnys place |
I'm irreplacable. |
lol, that is true. I'm not taking her place, but teaming up with her.  |
Ginny shes lying shes trying to be the new human harry potter encyclopedia _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zengrenouille


Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 9116
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jreyes130 wrote: |
| zengrenouille wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
| jreyes130 wrote: |
| its as if zengrenouille is taking ginnys place |
I'm irreplacable. |
lol, that is true. I'm not taking her place, but teaming up with her.  |
Ginny shes lying shes trying to be the new human harry potter encyclopedia |
Nah . . . I've just been a fan for longer, so I have all of those years of back information. Ginny is like super-human for being so knowledgeable with such a short time period of fandom. _________________

  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX



Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22430
|
Posted: April 8, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. |
| |