Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Forums

Forum RulesRules   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in
difference between book 4 and movie 4
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Harry Potter Forums Index » Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Author Message
Giovanna
Muggle
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Location: South Lanarkshire, Scotland
Posts: 43

PostPosted: October 29, 2007 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I watched the film this morning again.

Contrary to what everyone else seems to be saying, I thought it was really enjoyable.

I was annoyed that Dobby didn't make any appearance (nor did he in the OoTP) and also at the ending. Harry didn't receive his winnings in the film which he gave to Fred and George for the joke shop. They also didn't show any of the blackmail towards Ludo Bagman and of course, he wasn't mentioned in the film.

However, you have to bare in mind that films can't always accurately reflect the books. The film is merely based on the book and an alteration here and there can't be criticised. I thoroughly enjoyed, for example, the dragon scene. I thought it was much better than the books.
Back to top
Gh0st11
Muggle
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Nov 22, 2007
Posts: 46

PostPosted: November 22, 2007 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah it's ridiculous the amount of stuff they gotta cut out to make the most amount of money. It's only the money they care about, anyway...

They should really split the books up into separate films(like 2-3 films for each book)
Back to top
treehugger14
Wiznerd
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Oct 7, 2007
Location: See Wacky Macky's Location
Posts: 8898

PostPosted: November 23, 2007 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a good movie, which is fine, but My sisters didn't even get it until I explained it to them because they left so much out. LIke:
Ludo Bagman
Winky
SPEW
Dobby
the Mermaid-ness
The dursleys
ARthur barging in on the dursleys (ton-tongue toffee, eckeltricity, etc. Sad )
The whole quidditch match for the world cup was cut out except for the beginning
they left out omnioculars
they never got water and saw Oliver Wood and the others
they left out the sphinx and shimmery stuff in the maze.
Teh other schools came on the first day and not at halloween
the sirius head in the fire was gay
they put some sort of "act" on when the other schools came.
Neville didn't give harry the gillyweed, dobby did, which brings me back to dobby is gone.
They even left out Blast-Ended Skrewts.

I'm so mad at them!!!!!!!!!! Otherwise, tis a pretty flick.
_________________

Twilight fan? Come here!
^new link
Back to top
Gryffindork
Second Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Oct 26, 2007
Posts: 289

PostPosted: January 7, 2008 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm reading GoF now, and I shall say that I really like the movie. I'm noticing all of the parts that were left out or condensed (skrewts and the whole thing about Hermione's teeth reduction are the most obvious for me so far), and I'm pretty much okay with it.

In the movie, they did a fabulous job showing Hermione's entrance to the Yule Ball. Her dress was also much more beautiful than described in the book (periwinkle robe).

Oh, I also noticed that the first task is really different. In the book, Harry pulls clever tricks on his broom to get the Horntail away from the eggS, whereas in the movie, Harry is kinda clueless and there's that crazy chase. Personally, the movie was much more dramatic and looked much more dangerous than what I pictured while reading that chapter. However, I must say I was glad to read how the other champions obtained their egg.
Back to top
Miss Weasley
First Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Location: Greece
Posts: 111

PostPosted: March 30, 2008 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

there are so many differences!! i hate the 4th movie!! Mad
_________________
Back to top
Ginevra Malenki
Mrs. Cedric Diggory
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Feb 16, 2008
Location: Going Crazy =)
Posts: 6772

PostPosted: March 30, 2008 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

treehugger14 wrote:
Ludo Bagman
Winky
SPEW
Dobby
the Mermaid-ness
The dursleys
ARthur barging in on the dursleys (ton-tongue toffee, eckeltricity, etc. )
The whole quidditch match for the world cup was cut out except for the beginning
they left out omnioculars
they never got water and saw Oliver Wood and the others
they left out the sphinx and shimmery stuff in the maze.
The other schools came on the first day and not at halloween
the sirius head in the fire was gay
they put some sort of "act" on when the other schools came.
Neville didn't give harry the gillyweed, dobby did, which brings me back to dobby is gone.
They even left out Blast-Ended Skrewts.


^Look at that list! That's way to much to leave out. That's one of the reasons that i didn't like the fourth movie as much as the third. They left out to many things.
_________________

Back to top
barrytrotter
Squib
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Mar 26, 2008
Location: In the Ford Anglia Production Centre
Posts: 77

PostPosted: March 30, 2008 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i pretty much hated this film as much as i hated OotP! I know it;s a pretty low blow considering how much there is in the books but still a lot of things were left out.
1. Dobby and Winky
2. The woods at the Quidditch world cup - seeing draco malfoy in the woods - Harry losing his wand - Even narcissa malfoy was missing - why werent the weasleys in the top box?
3. The Judges scoring - Ron berating Karkaroff for giving Harry a lousy score in the 1st task
4. Krum and Fleur's contribution to the story!
5. Charlie Weasley?
6. Molly and Bill Weasley at the Final Task!
7. Voldemorts talking about the Dementors and Death Eaters missing
8. Mrs Diggory
9. The Tri-wizard winnings - where were they? does this mean that Fred and George didnt get it which leads to will Weasleys wizarding wheezes being cut from the HBP movie?
10. Ludo Bagman - even though he doesn't really have a role after GoF it would have been good for them to include him
_________________
Member #3 of the "David Yates has no direction for the Potter films and should therefore be stoned" club!

http://www.harrypotterfanfiction.com/viewuser.php?showuid=140382

Wand:11", Ash, Phoenix tail feather
House: Gryffindor
Patronus: Dragon
Back to top
Loch Monarch
Hogwarts Professor - Snape
Slytherin Member

Joined: May 4, 2008
Location: In my room reading the bible. probably Isaiah 40:31.
Posts: 1897

PostPosted: May 30, 2008 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the book is good and the movie is the start of the movie series going down hill
_________________
yes, it is true i am in love with 78dlsjhs!!!!

Do you believe in magic?

Growing up is mandartory, maturing is optional
Back to top
Back2theFuture
Muggle

Joined: May 31, 2008
Posts: 12

PostPosted: May 31, 2008 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

after movie 2 the rest went down the drain
Back to top
kiorsly
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: May 11, 2007
Posts: 713

PostPosted: July 4, 2008 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shewhoshouldnotbenamed wrote:
totally the bits they miss out upset me, id watch a 10hour harry potter film if it had everything in


me too!!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Harry Potter Forums Index » Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Copyright © 2005-2008 SparqTech Network. All rights reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group