Harry Potter Forums

Posts: 74 · Joined: Nov 23, 2007 Location: Rohnert Park, CA Posts: 74

Here's the article from MuggleNet:

Several visitors have sent in this article from the Daily Mail, which claims crews working on Half-Blood Prince have been told the final film will be split:

A film source said: "There's so much to fit that the view is the last movie should be in two halves. There is a huge battle when Harry, played by Daniel Radcliffe, takes on Voldemort that needs to be done really well."

What's more, the Daily Mail claims that big name directors such as Steven Spielberg are being considered to direct Deathly Hallows. We'll look into this rumor and let you know what Warner Brothers has to say!

This is going to be awesome. Any thoughts?
_________________

Animagi - Doe

Posts: 17117 · Posted: January 13, 2008 1:47 pm Post subject:

that'd be weird...7 books but 8 films. and what would they call them? part one and part two, or will they ask jk for another name or will they just make one up?

i'm split on this...they can fit so much more in with two but...i hate to split it cuz its meant to be together. it would spread out the harry potterness though, give us longer to have new stuff. hmmm.
_________________

They say home is where the heart is, so your real home's in your chest. --Captain Hammer

Posts: 74 · Joined: Nov 23, 2007 Location: Rohnert Park, CA Posts: 74

They would probably release them closer to eachother than if it were two entire different titles.
_________________

Animagi - Doe

Posts: 2065 · Posted: January 13, 2008 1:55 pm Post subject:

omg, omg!!! That`d be awesome!!! *squeek!* Then there`d be two final movies! And it would be HUGE!! wow... Shocked

_________________

Severus Snape fanfiction ''Temptation''
http://www.fanfiction.net/~reginavoltaire Chapter 14

Posts: 17117 · Posted: January 13, 2008 1:57 pm Post subject:

Posts: 74 · Joined: Nov 23, 2007 Location: Rohnert Park, CA Posts: 74

I really like this idea, but don't they know that HP fans would no doubt sit through a four hour movie? We'd watch it all day.
_________________

Animagi - Doe

Posts: 6563 · Posted: January 13, 2008 3:22 pm Post subject:

i'm kinda split on them splitting the movie, like arabella...

and that would be awesome if they got Steven Speilburg to direct DH Cool

_________________

An animal's eyes have the power to speak a great language.

Posts: 2065 · Posted: January 13, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject:

Posts: 2065 · Posted: January 13, 2008 3:27 pm Post subject:

Posts: 26976 · Posted: January 13, 2008 9:37 pm Post subject:

Order of the Phoenix was a much longer book and so far the shortest movie. For them to split up Deathly Hallows would be ludicrous. If they are considering doing it for DH, then why did they all refuse to do that for OotP? It should be 7 films for 7 books.
_________________

Blame it on a simple twist of fate. ~ Bob Dylan
"To commemorate a past event, you kill and eat an animal. It's a ritual sacrifice. With pie." ~ Anya <3

Posts: 10061 · Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Location: aus. Posts: 10061

well it would be way better to make two films, they need to include every detail possible.
_________________

Posts: 17948 · Posted: January 14, 2008 2:02 pm Post subject:

im keeping my fingers crossed Smile

_________________

You are up there!

Posts: 1030 · Joined: Aug 21, 2007 Location: Hogwarts Posts: 1030

I was si excited when I found out!!!, I like the idea but I'm worried, I know that its hard to mess up the movie but still they always find ways LOL seems like.
_________________

Posts: 74 · Joined: Nov 23, 2007 Location: Rohnert Park, CA Posts: 74

Posts: 352 · Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Location: SYD. Posts: 352

Spoiler:

Posts: 583 · Joined: Dec 12, 2007 Location: Hogsmeade Posts: 583

Well, I personally thought this would be a good 3 - 3.5 hr movie. It surely wouldn't be 4 hours anyway, but I like the idea of one whole movie, 'cause there'd be a few months to a year wait between the two halves.
_________________

Wand: Mahogany, 13" Phoenix feather
Patronus: Owl
Gender: Male

Posts: 793 · Posted: January 15, 2008 8:06 pm Post subject:

If the movie is that hard to make then I would rather just wait for a later release date of one whole long movie.
_________________
Amor Vincit Omnia!

Wand: 11 1/2 inches; Holly; Dragon Heartstring
Signature Spell: Stupefy
Patronus: Phoenix

Posts: 26976 · Posted: January 15, 2008 9:41 pm Post subject:

Posts: 5 · Joined: Jan 21, 2008 Location: New Yawk! Posts: 5

I heard that was a rumor and really, it's fake. I read it on IMDB a few minutes ago. I also heard that this movie comes out in 2010. I can't wait for it. Very Happy

Posts: 74 · Joined: Nov 23, 2007 Location: Rohnert Park, CA Posts: 74

IMDB doesn't know everything. I trust MuggleNet more. I just listened to their podcast and they're betting that this time, the rumor is true.
_________________

Animagi - Doe

Posts: 218 · Joined: Jun 28, 2007 Location: Detroit, Mich Posts: 218

they should stop part 1 right after the Gringotts scenes, and then have the 2nd part pick up right when they get to Hogwarts, that way part 2 can just be one big battle. and they should have Steven Spielberg Direct part 1, and have Peter Jackson(who is great with epic battles) do part 2.

Posts: 145 · Joined: Jul 23, 2007 Location: New York, USA Posts: 145

I don't think that would be a smart idea. Emma Watson was really considering not doing the last two, I don't think she would stick around for 3 more.
_________________

Posts: 3442 · Posted: February 1, 2008 8:03 pm Post subject:

god i dont know what to pick... i mean i want every little battle in it like all the other books you know all the details... but it stopping when they get to say malfoys mansion id be mad... but then again i want everything but i dont want it to be killed because i h ave to wait half a year to see the rest...
_________________

Posts: 145 · Joined: Jul 23, 2007 Location: New York, USA Posts: 145

Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Community and Bulletin Boards