Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Forums

Forum RulesRules   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in
The Room of Requirement

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Harry Potter Forums Index » Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Author Message
MasterOfTheDarkArts
Muggle
Slytherin Member

Joined: Dec 7, 2007
Location: California
Posts: 28

PostPosted: December 7, 2007 12:57 pm    Post subject: The Room of Requirement Reply with quote

Did anyone else disagree with how Umbridge and her squad was able to blast their way into the room of requirement in the movie??? It really makes me wonder how they will setup the 6th and 7th movies.

The room of requirement was so important in the last 2 books, that having someone simply blast their way in defeats the purpose of the room...don't you think??
_________________
-Master of the Dark Arts
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27794

PostPosted: December 7, 2007 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no. they had cho with them to tell them where the DA was and how to get there. cho said it, and then they went there and saw the room and blasted it.
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
MasterOfTheDarkArts
Muggle
Slytherin Member

Joined: Dec 7, 2007
Location: California
Posts: 28

PostPosted: December 7, 2007 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OOOOHHHH!!!! They were able to see it because Cho was there and made the room appear...THEN they blasted the door open. Damn...that one got by me. *smacks himself* DUH!!

Thanks halfbloodprincess!
_________________
-Master of the Dark Arts
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27794

PostPosted: December 7, 2007 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

no prob! Smile
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
Nargles6284
Fifth Year
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Dec 12, 2007
Location: Hogsmeade
Posts: 583

PostPosted: December 22, 2007 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, it was obvious, really.
_________________


Wand: Mahogany, 13" Phoenix feather
Patronus: Owl
Gender: Male
Back to top
raveman07
Second Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Dec 21, 2007
Location: in detention with umbridge
Posts: 286

PostPosted: December 22, 2007 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

didn't they use the veritaserum on cho?
Back to top
Auror Monroe
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Oct 2, 2007
Location: Ministry of Magic - Level 2: Auror Headquarters
Posts: 706

PostPosted: December 23, 2007 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(Shouldnt this be moved to the movie section for OotP) I also thought that it was a bit ridiculous that they blasted the door down. What was wrong with capturing them as they were leaving as was so in the book?
_________________
It's Not Over!

Length: 11 1/2 inches
Wood: Holly
Core: Dragon Heartstring
Back to top
raveman07
Second Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Dec 21, 2007
Location: in detention with umbridge
Posts: 286

PostPosted: December 23, 2007 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ya i thought that i was kinda cheap
_________________
"Of course, he might have crawled up into the airing cupboard and died...But I mustn't get my hopes up..."
- Sirius Black
Back to top
darkwillow
Muggle
Slytherin Member

Joined: Dec 25, 2007
Posts: 18

PostPosted: December 25, 2007 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the book, it was Cho's friend who cheated on D.A. but in the movie it was Cho!
Back to top
R.D.S
Muggle

Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Location: Charleston,SC
Posts: 4

PostPosted: March 11, 2008 12:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yea i dont like how the movie made Cho the tattletale..i remember watching it in theaters like hold on that isnt how it happened lol..
Back to top
jreyes130
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 725

PostPosted: April 10, 2008 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well it would have taken a while to do it how it was in the book but i thought it was alright how they did it. But there replacing a quite a few people with cho like in the 6th movie she is the one that is going to be cursed by the necklace not the chaser i forgot her name ginny help me out with that.
_________________
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 23197

PostPosted: April 11, 2008 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jreyes130 wrote:
Well it would have taken a while to do it how it was in the book but i thought it was alright how they did it. But there replacing a quite a few people with cho like in the 6th movie she is the one that is going to be cursed by the necklace not the chaser i forgot her name ginny help me out with that.


Katie Bell? I believe she is still going to be cursed, last I heard. I know they cast that part.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_7150000/newsid_7152200/7152288.stm
_________________

^courtesy of Arabella
Back to top
Adebola
First Year
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Mar 29, 2008
Posts: 109

PostPosted: April 12, 2008 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mariette Edgecombe told on the D.A because her mom worked with the Ministry Of Magic, in the book. I just don't know why Cho told them though, in the movie.
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 23197

PostPosted: April 12, 2008 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adebola wrote:
Mariette Edgecombe told on the D.A because her mom worked with the Ministry Of Magic, in the book. I just don't know why Cho told them though, in the movie.


In the movie it was the veritaserum that Umbridge got from Snape. She used it on Cho. Hermione also mentions that Cho's mom (or was it her dad?) works for the Ministry. But, yeah, that was in the movie, not the book. Stupid changes. Sad
_________________

^courtesy of Arabella
Back to top
jreyes130
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 725

PostPosted: April 12, 2008 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know that they cast her but. But i heard that they changed the script after it .
_________________
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 23197

PostPosted: April 12, 2008 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jreyes130 wrote:
I know that they cast her but. But i heard that they changed the script after it .


That would really annoy me if they changed that. It's bad enough that they made it Cho that ratted them out, but if they changed this, too? How dumb.
_________________

^courtesy of Arabella
Back to top
jreyes130
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 725

PostPosted: April 13, 2008 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GinnyX wrote:
jreyes130 wrote:
I know that they cast her but. But i heard that they changed the script after it .


That would really annoy me if they changed that. It's bad enough that they made it Cho that ratted them out, but if they changed this, too? How dumb.


Yea but I see how it can work for them considering the movie is supposed to be on Harry and Ginny's relationship. They can make Harry worry for Cho and have to decide who he likes more Cho or Ginny.
_________________
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 23197

PostPosted: April 13, 2008 12:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jreyes130 wrote:
GinnyX wrote:
jreyes130 wrote:
I know that they cast her but. But i heard that they changed the script after it .


That would really annoy me if they changed that. It's bad enough that they made it Cho that ratted them out, but if they changed this, too? How dumb.


Yea but I see how it can work for them considering the movie is supposed to be on Harry and Ginny's relationship. They can make Harry worry for Cho and have to decide who he likes more Cho or Ginny.


The problem I had with that change was... there was no resolution to harry and Cho's relationship. Everyone was angry at Cho for tattling, but since it wasn't her fault she told (she was under the influence of veritaserum) then wouldn't Harry forgive her? Of all the problems that Harry and Cho had in the books, they left them all out. As far as I can see, Harry had no reason to break up with Cho in the movies. So when the HBP movie starts... will they be going out? I mean, probably not, but why not? The film makers gave us no reason to think Harry would be done with Cho.
_________________

^courtesy of Arabella
Back to top
jreyes130
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 725

PostPosted: April 13, 2008 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GinnyX wrote:
jreyes130 wrote:
GinnyX wrote:
jreyes130 wrote:
I know that they cast her but. But i heard that they changed the script after it .


That would really annoy me if they changed that. It's bad enough that they made it Cho that ratted them out, but if they changed this, too? How dumb.


Yea but I see how it can work for them considering the movie is supposed to be on Harry and Ginny's relationship. They can make Harry worry for Cho and have to decide who he likes more Cho or Ginny.


The problem I had with that change was... there was no resolution to harry and Cho's relationship. Everyone was angry at Cho for tattling, but since it wasn't her fault she told (she was under the influence of veritaserum) then wouldn't Harry forgive her? Of all the problems that Harry and Cho had in the books, they left them all out. As far as I can see, Harry had no reason to break up with Cho in the movies. So when the HBP movie starts... will they be going out? I mean, probably not, but why not? The film makers gave us no reason to think Harry would be done with Cho.


Yea I completely agree with you they made Harry look like jerk because he left for a reason that she had no control over
_________________
Back to top
LoopyLoveGood
First Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jun 6, 2008
Location: Scotland!!!
Posts: 158

PostPosted: June 8, 2008 5:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jreyes130 wrote:
Well it would have taken a while to do it how it was in the book but i thought it was alright how they did it. But there replacing a quite a few people with cho like in the 6th movie she is the one that is going to be cursed by the necklace not the chaser i forgot her name ginny help me out with that.



but thats defats the purpose it has to be Katie Bell because it messes up the quiddtch team so dean gets in and harry starts to get his feelings for ginny and wants to hurt dean!!!! idiot director the better change him for the final ones
_________________
Check out ma harry potter fan syt www.LoopyLoveGoodsSite.piczo.com


Back to top
pottergirl66
Ministry Official
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Mar 1, 2008
Location: somewhere with nathan. . .
Posts: 2372

PostPosted: June 8, 2008 7:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LoopyLoveGood wrote:
jreyes130 wrote:
Well it would have taken a while to do it how it was in the book but i thought it was alright how they did it. But there replacing a quite a few people with cho like in the 6th movie she is the one that is going to be cursed by the necklace not the chaser i forgot her name ginny help me out with that.



but thats defats the purpose it has to be Katie Bell because it messes up the quiddtch team so dean gets in and harry starts to get his feelings for ginny and wants to hurt dean!!!! idiot director the better change him for the final ones


you have a good point there.
_________________

call me Kimmy
Back to top
jreyes130
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 725

PostPosted: June 8, 2008 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pottergirl66 wrote:
LoopyLoveGood wrote:
jreyes130 wrote:
Well it would have taken a while to do it how it was in the book but i thought it was alright how they did it. But there replacing a quite a few people with cho like in the 6th movie she is the one that is going to be cursed by the necklace not the chaser i forgot her name ginny help me out with that.



but thats defats the purpose it has to be Katie Bell because it messes up the quiddtch team so dean gets in and harry starts to get his feelings for ginny and wants to hurt dean!!!! idiot director the better change him for the final ones


you have a good point there.


No they have all ready said that David Yates will be director again
_________________
Back to top
LoopyLoveGood
First Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jun 6, 2008
Location: Scotland!!!
Posts: 158

PostPosted: June 8, 2008 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jreyes130 wrote:
pottergirl66 wrote:
LoopyLoveGood wrote:
jreyes130 wrote:
Well it would have taken a while to do it how it was in the book but i thought it was alright how they did it. But there replacing a quite a few people with cho like in the 6th movie she is the one that is going to be cursed by the necklace not the chaser i forgot her name ginny help me out with that.



but thats defats the purpose it has to be Katie Bell because it messes up the quiddtch team so dean gets in and harry starts to get his feelings for ginny and wants to hurt dean!!!! idiot director the better change him for the final ones


you have a good point there.


No they have all ready said that David Yates will be director again








DAMMMMMMMMMMMMMM IT
_________________
Check out ma harry potter fan syt www.LoopyLoveGoodsSite.piczo.com


Back to top
kiorsly
Seventh Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: May 11, 2007
Posts: 713

PostPosted: July 3, 2008 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

darkwillow wrote:
In the book, it was Cho's friend who cheated on D.A. but in the movie it was Cho!


yeah, they changed a lot when they publish the movie.
i hate when this is happen.
Back to top
Display posts from previous: