Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Forums

Forum RulesRules   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in
The Portait of Albus P.W.B Dumbledore
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Harry Potter Forums Index » Theories and Speculation
Author Message
teamopiu
Muggle
Slytherin Member

Joined: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 14

PostPosted: December 20, 2007 5:32 pm    Post subject: The Portait of Albus P.W.B Dumbledore Reply with quote

Could Harry and other's have long converstaions with the portait of Dumbledore as if it were the real thing. Are the Headmasters and Headmistres's portrait's at Hogwarts an exact copy of the person they are repersenting.

I mean, in a way I don't see how the death of Dumbledore could be very sad, seeing as you can talk to his portait in the Headmasters study?.
_________________
Wand Type: 12inches, Hallow ,Phoenix Tail Feather.

Back to top
potterisnoplotter
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Location: Running around in circles, trying to make sense of this crazy thing we call life.
Posts: 2631

PostPosted: December 20, 2007 6:04 pm    Post subject: Portrait Reply with quote

yeah i totally agree, i always figured harry wld carry round a pic of dumbledore when he was lookin for the horcruxes.
_________________
We're goin' down down in an earlier round,
And sugar we're goin' down swingin'
I'll be your number one with a bullet,
Loaded God complex, cock it and pull it

We will never forget.
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 20, 2007 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's just a sort-of imprint of his soul. It's not the real thing. If anything it would be very bittersweet to talk to the portrait at all, as Harry did at the end of DH. It wasn't really DD, it was just a shadow of him, a hint of what he was.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
ThE_DaRk_MaRk
Riku
Hufflepuff Prefect

Joined: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 6452

PostPosted: December 20, 2007 9:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Portrait Reply with quote

potterisnoplotter wrote:
yeah i totally agree, i always figured harry wld carry round a pic of dumbledore when he was lookin for the horcruxes.


He wouldn't be able to carry the canvas of DD around because all of the portraits were loyal to the headmaster of Hogwarts, not to server anyone else.
_________________
Join Reality Of It All!!!
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 21, 2007 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ive a bit of a problem with portraits and horcruxes. what makes a portrait, not a horcrux if the subjects in the portraits can think and act for themselves?
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 21, 2007 1:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

halfbloodprincess wrote:
ive a bit of a problem with portraits and horcruxes. what makes a portrait, not a horcrux if the subjects in the portraits can think and act for themselves?


because the portraits aren't created by a deplorable act, so horrid that Hermiopne doesn't even say it to Ron and Harry. In other words, I think it more has to do with the act behind making them.
Plus, a horcrux is a piece of the person's soul, while the portrait is just a shadow of the person.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
zengrenouille
Head Unspeakable
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 10258

PostPosted: December 21, 2007 1:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ on top of that, horcruxes and portraits have two entirely different purposes. Portraits are merely one way for wizards to leave an imprint of themselves. They don't carry an bit of souls. They merely are like video recordings of people. They regurgitate the advice that these people were popular for.

Horcruxes are tools to help people maintain immortality. They actually carry pieces of souls. Unlike portraits, people cannot die when they have horcruxes. Messing with horcruxes mean messing with fate. There is an extreme difference.
_________________

Please support the Diabetes Walk
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 22, 2007 12:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yah it depends on the act and whether or not it contains a bot of soul. but, portraits can think independently as well. what is the difference between the imprint and the soul if they can think?
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 22, 2007 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

halfbloodprincess wrote:
yah it depends on the act and whether or not it contains a bot of soul. but, portraits can think independently as well. what is the difference between the imprint and the soul if they can think?


None of the pieces of soul could think. Neither could the portraits, really.

Here is a piece of an interview JKR gave, she explaisn about portraits a bit further

Quote:
J K Rowling at the Edinburgh Book Festival

All the paintings we have seen at Hogwarts are of dead people. They seem to be living through their portraits. How is this so? If there was a painting of Harry’s parents, would he be able to obtain advice from them?

That is a very good question. They are all of dead people; they are not as fully realised as ghosts, as you have probably noticed. The place where you see them really talk is in Dumbledore’s office, primarily; the idea is that the previous headmasters and headmistresses leave behind a faint imprint of themselves. They leave their aura, almost, in the office and they can give some counsel to the present occupant, but it is not like being a ghost. They repeat catchphrases, almost. The portrait of Sirius’ mother is not a very 3D personality; she is not very fully realised. She repeats catchphrases that she had when she was alive. If Harry had a portrait of his parents it would not help him a great deal. If he could meet them as ghosts, that would be a much more meaningful interaction, but as Nick explained at the end of Phoenix—I am straying into dangerous territory, but I think you probably know what he explained—there are some people who would not come back as ghosts because they are unafraid, or less afraid, of death.


In other words, the portraits of people with an imprint of their aura. A Horcrux is a piece of soul that was ripped away from a person. It can't talk or move around or give advice. It wouldn't even exist without it's host, whether it be a diary or a snake.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 22, 2007 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well ok... the portrait of sirius' mom was "trained" to say "filthy mudbloods! scum! besmirching the house of my fathers!" and prongs was trained to say "professor snape is an ugly git" in the marauder's map. but what about phineas? phineas actually thinks...

i think it was in the horcruxes chapter when dumbledore said that he realized the diary was a horcrux, because it could think for itself... aside from possessing a person. i mean, alright, portraits cannot possess people... but when he said "think for itself"... welll portraits do that too...
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 22, 2007 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

halfbloodprincess wrote:
well ok... the portrait of sirius' mom was "trained" to say "filthy mudbloods! scum! besmirching the house of my fathers!" and prongs was trained to say "professor snape is an ugly git" in the marauder's map. but what about phineas? phineas actually thinks...

i think it was in the horcruxes chapter when dumbledore said that he realized the diary was a horcrux, because it could think for itself... aside from possessing a person. i mean, alright, portraits cannot possess people... but when he said "think for itself"... welll portraits do that too...


Neither entity really thinks for itself. You are giving the horcruxes and the portraits way too much credit. They aren't people or animals, they have no tangible brain. All of the portraits are mimics of the people, but Mrs. Black's portrait is just a shoddy version of the headmasters' and headmistress' portraits.
JKR says this about the headmasters' portraits...
"They repeat catchphrases, almost."

The same goes with the Horcrux. It doesn't think on it's own, it is only a piece of wicked soul left behind.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
viktor121
First Year
Slytherin Member

Joined: Dec 1, 2007
Location: Escaping Azkaban
Posts: 153

PostPosted: December 23, 2007 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah i tought so too...i mean he could talk to him anyway
_________________

Bosna&Hercegovina rocks my socks!!!
Wand type: Phoenix feather,Redwood,8 3/4 inches.
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 24, 2007 1:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

but they are updated with current info... they actually serve the present headmaster, they can relay information...
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 24, 2007 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

halfbloodprincess wrote:
but they are updated with current info... they actually serve the present headmaster, they can relay information...


yeah, they are basically repeating what they heard, kinda like parrots, except they aren't birds.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
zengrenouille
Head Unspeakable
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Aug 1, 2007
Location: Sharon, PA
Posts: 10258

PostPosted: December 25, 2007 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

halfbloodprincess wrote:
but they are updated with current info... they actually serve the present headmaster, they can relay information...



Computers can keep up with current information, repeat popular phrases, give and send messages, and give advice. They aren't the same as people, though. I think of portraits in a similar way.
_________________

Please support the Diabetes Walk
Back to top
maximus55669
First Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Oct 19, 2007
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 195

PostPosted: December 26, 2007 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

an imprint, a shadow, nothing more. the portrait has a sembelence of the person that accupied it. It may respond based on the nature/past responses of that person and may even comprehend current information, but in the end, it isn't the same as the original.
_________________
Ice shall instill the heart of man...only silence will remain
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 27, 2007 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah they retain their old characters... and their knowlegde remains the same since the time they died... but you can update them with info. the portrait of phineas is updated with info, which he uses to think... he doesnt just relay info... he knows about harry potter and voldemort and stuff, and makes use of that info... like a horcrux does... remember, riddle's diary did not know that lord voldemort was vanquished, and he did not know about harry potter, until ginny told him... right?
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 27, 2007 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

halfbloodprincess wrote:
yeah they retain their old characters... and their knowlegde remains the same since the time they died... but you can update them with info. the portrait of phineas is updated with info, which he uses to think... he doesnt just relay info... he knows about harry potter and voldemort and stuff, and makes use of that info... like a horcrux does... remember, riddle's diary did not know that lord voldemort was vanquished, and he did not know about harry potter, until ginny told him... right?


Right, but the Horcrux was only able to retain that information by possessing Ginny as she poured out her soul to him. Without Ginny writing in it, the Horcrux was useless, it just lay there dormant in that diary until Ginny started writing in it.
The portraits, on the other hand, do not need someone to write on it, or wear it, or whateevr to make the comments and say the phrases that they do.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 28, 2007 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah so pretty much the thinking capacity of portraits and horcruxes are the same. why was that particular line very misleading?
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 28, 2007 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

halfbloodprincess wrote:
yeah so pretty much the thinking capacity of portraits and horcruxes are the same. why was that particular line very misleading?


I think the difference is still shakey. We never find out what the diadem or the cup was capable of, if anything at all. It makes it comparing the two things very difficult, since Horcruxes c an come in many shapes and sizes.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 28, 2007 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sounds like portraits are more capable of thinking... the only power which i know a horcrux has that a portrait has not is that it can possess people...
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 25644

PostPosted: December 28, 2007 12:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And it can feed off of poeple's insecurities, as the locket did to Ron.
I don't know if it can so much possess someone, as it can work off of their vulnerabilities. What I mean is, since Ginny poured her "soul" out, Tom was able to possess her. Had she not, then perhaps he wouldn't have been able to possess her. Same with Ron. The locket effected Harry and Hermione, but not as much as Ron. Because, as JKR said, he was the "heart" of the group as well as very insecure.
_________________

^made by Fiendfyre

Blame it on a simple twist of fate.
Back to top
potterisnoplotter
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Location: Running around in circles, trying to make sense of this crazy thing we call life.
Posts: 2631

PostPosted: December 28, 2007 10:50 am    Post subject: Portrait Reply with quote

i think that the interaction of any given magical object (especially horcruxes) has to do with the level of trust or insecurities that the possessor has. for instance, the diary was able to posses Ginny because she was nervous and insecure at her new school. the locket bothered ron more the harry and Hermione because he was feeling rejected and cowardly, he was feeling bad about coming with harry as well as feeling bad about that.
_________________
We're goin' down down in an earlier round,
And sugar we're goin' down swingin'
I'll be your number one with a bullet,
Loaded God complex, cock it and pull it

We will never forget.
Back to top
maximus55669
First Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Oct 19, 2007
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 195

PostPosted: December 28, 2007 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well, the diary took control of ginny because she wrote in it and basically poured her soul in it, therefore handing her soul over to tom riddle. In ron's case, the locket basically like you said, enhanced his insecurities.
_________________
Ice shall instill the heart of man...only silence will remain
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28286

PostPosted: December 28, 2007 2:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote