Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Forums

Forum RulesRules   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in
Two Lives May be Saved...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Harry Potter Forums Index » Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Author Message
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27796

PostPosted: April 18, 2007 4:16 am    Post subject: Two Lives May be Saved... Reply with quote

right dumbledore said to harry and hermione that they needed extra time. three turns. then he said that if all goes well, they may save more than just one life. well it sounds like buckbeak's life to us, but he could also have meant saving harry from the dementors. i mean, harry went back in time to save himeself and sirius from the dementor's kiss.

so when dd said, "save two lives", he may have meant harry and sirius, not sirius and buckbeak.
Back to top
Arwen
Fourth Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 448

PostPosted: April 18, 2007 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think so. He was talking about Sirius and Buckbeak.
_________________
Name: Arwen Black
House: Gryffindor
Patronus: Snowy Owl
Wand: Phoenix Feather, Redwood 8 3/4 inch
Blood: Pure
Back to top
shewhoshouldnotbenamed
Hyuuga Prodigy
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 1, 2007
Location: England
Posts: 7003

PostPosted: April 18, 2007 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yep harry had to survive because he was able to use the time turner.... does that make sense to you??

i know what i mean
_________________
SheWho, GinnyX and Ravvy
n00bbusters is the name
pwning n00bs is the game

^thanks Ara
What Would Snape Do? <3
Back to top
Arwen
Fourth Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 448

PostPosted: April 19, 2007 3:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also understand what you mean.
_________________
Name: Arwen Black
House: Gryffindor
Patronus: Snowy Owl
Wand: Phoenix Feather, Redwood 8 3/4 inch
Blood: Pure
Back to top
Remus
Hogwarts Graduate
Slytherin Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2007
Location: Honeydukes
Posts: 2780

PostPosted: April 19, 2007 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Me too! Razz
_________________
RP:Draco Malfoy

RP too: Edward Rivers, from Ravenclaw
and his sly brother, Steven.

Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27796

PostPosted: April 23, 2007 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well yeah, initialy i thought of buckbeak, but maybe dumbledore was aware that buckbeak was gonna go free anyway. he said, "search the skies" to fudge and macnair, because he might have had an ida that buckbeak was walking towards the forest
Back to top
Elphaba
Muggle
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: May 11, 2007
Location: Kiamo Ko
Posts: 28

PostPosted: May 12, 2007 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, the reason Buckbeak went free was because Harry saved his life. So the two lives are Buckbeak and Sirius.
_________________
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27796

PostPosted: May 12, 2007 1:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, but the reason that buckbeak is alive in the first place is because harry went back in time to save himself, which then enables him to save buckbeak.
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
Mr. Lovegood
Second Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jun 2, 2007
Posts: 254

PostPosted: June 2, 2007 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know what you mean, but harry was only in danger when he went back in time so.... He was prolly talking about Buckbeak.
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27796

PostPosted: June 3, 2007 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dunno...
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 23256

PostPosted: June 30, 2007 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Harry couldn't have died the first time around because... well if he was dead, then how was he still alive in the hospital ward.

He manages to save himself with the patronus.

The first time around Harry is saved by a patronus, as is Sirius.

But Buckbeak gets the ax.
And Sirius is about the be fed to the dementors, thus ending his life by sucking out his soul.

The second time around Harry and hermione save Buckbeak and manage to get Sirius to safety. Thus, saving both Buckbeak and Sirius. Technically Harry did save himself, but he lives either way, both in the first time and the seocnd time.
_________________

^courtesy of Arabella
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27796

PostPosted: June 30, 2007 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dunno... but it was more important that he went back in time to save himself.

OH! I GET IT!

two lives may be saved...

if harry was going to turn back time, eventually it was to get sirius out of the tower. but if everything went right, and additional two lives may be saved - his and buckbeak's. if everything went wrong, then no life would be saved. if events just turned out partially ok, then buckbeak would be dead, but he and sirius would be alive.
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
EssenceOfPhlegm
Fourth Year
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Jul 2, 2007
Location: Hogwarts School Of Witchcraft And Wizardry!
Posts: 463

PostPosted: July 3, 2007 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How did it mean Harry and Buckbeak? Harry would have been alive, because he was using the time-turner.. He was saving Sirius and Buckbeak.
_________________
Name: Crystal Wolfrain
Age/Year: 14/4th
Sex: Female
House: Ravenclaw
Hair: Long Black Hair
Eyes: Big, Hazel Eyes
Wand: Mahogony 12 inch, Phoenix feather
Back to top
Arabella
Mrs. Fred Weasley
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Location: In my field of paper flowers
Posts: 15819

PostPosted: July 3, 2007 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

time travel makes my head hurt...but I think that there was no 'first time" it was all ONE time, just experienced through two different points of view. JK was very careful to make sure everything matched up. The trio never saw Buckbeak get beheaded, they just heard the axe thudding...INTO THE PUMPKIN. However this view confuses me about who was to be saved...DD said more than one life though...not two. He could have meant 3, Harry Sirius and Buckbeak.
_________________
Back to top
halfbloodprincess
Chief Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 27796

PostPosted: July 3, 2007 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

good point arabella.

er, read the previous posts essenceofphlegm to get the gist...
_________________


I love my handsome Erik
Love
Back to top
The Potions Master
Hogwarts Professor - Snape
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Feb 17, 2007
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3215

PostPosted: July 8, 2007 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

it makes sense to me that he ment save harry/sirius but i think he ment sirius/buckbeak
_________________

Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 23256

PostPosted: July 8, 2007 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arabella wrote:
time travel makes my head hurt...but I think that there was no 'first time" it was all ONE time, just experienced through two different points of view. JK was very careful to make sure everything matched up. The trio never saw Buckbeak get beheaded, they just heard the axe thudding...INTO THE PUMPKIN. However this view confuses me about who was to be saved...DD said more than one life though...not two. He could have meant 3, Harry Sirius and Buckbeak.


Right there was just one time, from two different points of views. I just meant that the "first time" was the "first time" Hermione and Harry went through those hours.
_________________

^courtesy of Arabella
Back to top
ginastags2315
Squib
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 92

PostPosted: July 15, 2007 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think he was talking about Sirius and Buckbeak. Harry and Hermione needed Buckbeak to get to the window of the room Sirius was in, and Sirius needed him to escape.
Back to top
edward1414
Squib
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Jul 22, 2007
Location: kent
Posts: 85

PostPosted: July 22, 2007 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you have to take into account the fact that dementors do not kill per say. they remove souls but do not damage the physical body. harry would not, therefore, have been killed by the dementors so logically he meant buckbeak and sirius.

the arguement to this is that sirius was going to be kissed, not killed and therefore if the arguement above is true then doubledores statement of saving "two" lives would be wrong.

the only other possibility i can think of is that dumbledore does not know about harry sending the patronus. while this is likely it is the only thing i can think of
Back to top
mynameiskerry_xo
Hogwarts Graduate
Slytherin Member

Joined: Jul 21, 2007
Location: philadelphia<3
Posts: 6120

PostPosted: July 27, 2007 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This could be true, but I do think that Dumbledore meant Sirius and Buckbeak
Back to top
edward1414
Squib
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Jul 22, 2007
Location: kent
Posts: 85

PostPosted: July 27, 2007 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeh, i agree, the simplest answer seems to be the most probably and best fitting
_________________

Back to top
Ronfreak
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jun 9, 2007
Location: Flirting with Rupert
Posts: 1048

PostPosted: July 27, 2007 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i believe that DD meant sirius and buckbeak but he could've mean't harry too. he didn't say two lives could be saved, he said more than one lives could be saved.
_________________
Back to top
mckpeachy12
Squib
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Godric's Hollow
Posts: 81

PostPosted: July 27, 2007 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Lovegood wrote:
I know what you mean, but harry was only in danger when he went back in time so.... He was prolly talking about Buckbeak.


DUMBLY DOESNT KNOW EVERYTHING... HE MAY NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT HARRY AND THE DEMENTORS AND PARTRONUS.
_________________

http://www.brickfish.com/Pages/PhotosAlbums/PhotoView.aspx?picid=563618_4872913&pid=933399&scid=293
Please Go Here!!!
Back to top
edward1414
Squib
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Jul 22, 2007
Location: kent
Posts: 85

PostPosted: July 28, 2007 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

he always seems to be, something incidentally which JK continues in the deathly hallows. i dont think it would have been the same with out harry and dumbledores chat (KINGS CROSS)
_________________

Back to top
-MIGGY-
Muggle
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Jul 28, 2007
Location: Surrounded by Muggles
Posts: 33

PostPosted: July 29, 2007 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmmmm I'm trying to find Harry and Dumbledore's coversation at Kings Cross[/quote]
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Harry Potter Forums Index » Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2