Harry Potter Forums

Posts: 274 · Joined: Sep 4, 2007 Location: sarnia, ont canada Posts: 274

do you guys thing this movie will have the same rating as the last? Or could the push it to being rated R because of more violence.

Posts: 26976 · Posted: October 2, 2007 1:35 am Post subject:

I think they will try to keep it pg13. The Harry Potter franchise has been known as a "family" thing and it's doing really well in that category. I don't think they'll want to jeopardize that reputation.
_________________

Blame it on a simple twist of fate. ~ Bob Dylan
"To commemorate a past event, you kill and eat an animal. It's a ritual sacrifice. With pie." ~ Anya <3

Posts: 3641 · Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Location: Oz Posts: 3641

Well they could jeopardise the films integrity by trying to stick to that. The US needs a better ratings system, it just goes PG to R, Oz has M(recommended for 15+) and MA(must be 15+) inbetween
_________________

Posts: 26976 · Posted: October 2, 2007 2:01 am Post subject:

The US rating system doesn't go from pg straight to R. It goes G, PG, PG13, then R.... then NC17, but ya definitely don't want that as the rating. That rating means that no one is allowed under the age of 17, not even with parental guidance, is allowed. Once it get's an R rating in the US, then no children will be allowed to go. I wouldn't even take children to see an R rated movie.
_________________

Blame it on a simple twist of fate. ~ Bob Dylan
"To commemorate a past event, you kill and eat an animal. It's a ritual sacrifice. With pie." ~ Anya <3

Posts: 3641 · Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Location: Oz Posts: 3641

^ I meant PG13. There should be something between 13 and 17.. It's like they expect kids to be innocent when they're 16 and all of a sudden when they hit 17 they have this dramatic change, it just isn't realistic.
_________________

Posts: 1595 · Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Location: australia Posts: 1595

if it isnt PG13 it would only go up to M i imagine
_________________

Posts: 28370 · Posted: December 15, 2007 9:33 am Post subject:

does kissing passionately without fondling make the movie an R?
_________________

Posts: 119 · Posted: December 15, 2007 7:36 pm Post subject:

Yeah, I can't think of anything that would make the movie R rated. Not even the more deadly DH.

There is alot of death, but it takes more than that to get an R in the US. There would probably have to be either alot of language and/or nudity to get an R rating. And if they did that it wouldn't be sticking to the story.
_________________

Visit Spinners End!
9 3/4", Oak, Phoenix

Posts: 488 · Joined: Dec 7, 2007 Location: Billingham Posts: 488

It'll probs be 12+ here in england, and that's because every fuckin' film is nowadays.
_________________
smoke away the shakes and fall asleep...

...and I'm nothing more than a line in your book

Posts: 1595 · Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Location: australia Posts: 1595

yeh it wouldnt go to r rated!
that would be stupid coz all the kids wouldnt be able to see it!
and they wouldnt make a big enough profit to make the next one!
_________________

Posts: 288 · Joined: Aug 16, 2007 Location: Washington Posts: 288

I doubt they would make it R. It would eliminate way too much of their potential audience to do that. I also think it would be pretty easy to tone down the violence when they always end up cutting two thirds of the story too.
_________________

Posts: 28370 · Posted: December 15, 2007 11:38 pm Post subject:

yes i agree...
_________________

Posts: 1595 · Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Location: australia Posts: 1595

yeh good point!
_________________

Posts: 11290 · Joined: Aug 1, 2007 Location: Sharon, PA Posts: 11290

Posts: 655 · Posted: December 17, 2007 10:29 am Post subject:

i think they'll keep it the same...it will be a little bit darker,but hp movies are not so violent(they don't kick and punch themselfes)
_________________

Posts: 11290 · Joined: Aug 1, 2007 Location: Sharon, PA Posts: 11290

People were killed in the last two movies. Even though it wasn't bloody, it was still a rather violent for kids. The sixth book really wasn't more violent. Neither was the seventh, come to thin of it. Deaths were mentioned more than they were happening ifrom Harry's PoV
_________________

Please support the Diabetes Walk

Posts: 352 · Joined: Dec 11, 2007 Location: SYD. Posts: 352

i would imagine it would be M in australia
_________________
22/8/08. Best day of my life.

Posts: 28370 · Posted: December 18, 2007 7:31 am Post subject:

Posts: 583 · Joined: Dec 12, 2007 Location: Hogsmeade Posts: 583

M - Recommended for mature audiences. 15 years and over.
_________________

Wand: Mahogany, 13" Phoenix feather
Patronus: Owl
Gender: Male

Posts: 136 · Joined: Dec 20, 2007 Posts: 136

no way will it be r itll probably be m like the last one its only kissing and a bit of fighting its not blood and guts all ova the place its cool

Posts: 5281 · Joined: Nov 4, 2007 Location: australia Posts: 5281

in australia it will be M.

I didn't know movies in america went strait from PG13 to R. that's really strange... i like out way better Smile

hehe
_________________

DON'T EAT THE DAISIES

Posts: 26976 · Posted: December 28, 2007 1:53 am Post subject:

Posts: 583 · Joined: Dec 12, 2007 Location: Hogsmeade Posts: 583

Posts: 15859 · Joined: Aug 1, 2007 Location: Santa Rosa, CA Posts: 15859

If its rated R ppl will be pissed

i bet its gonna be PG-13
_________________

I Love Makenzie
I hate it when they tell us how far we came to be as if our peoples history started with slavery

Posts: 218 · Joined: Jun 16, 2007 Location: Ohio, USA Posts: 218

They arn't going to make a movie rated R that's based off a childrens book! There is not way they're going to do it, nor would JKR allow it. Less people would watch it, WB would never do it.

Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Community and Bulletin Boards