Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Forums

Forum RulesRules   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in
Vote for the seventh film!
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Harry Potter Forums Index » Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

How long should the new film be?
2-3 hrs
33%
 33%  [ 42 ]
4-5 hrs
60%
 60%  [ 77 ]
a series with lots of episodes
6%
 6%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 127

Author Message
Franklin Wang
Muggle
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Posts: 16

PostPosted: August 14, 2007 7:47 pm    Post subject: Vote for the seventh film! Reply with quote

You guys think the seventh film should be shorter(2-3hrs) or longer(4-5hrs) or they should make a series(like the 24)?

Personally I think the seventh book is too thick and informative to be included in a film like the Phoenix one now. Or it will just be a huge collection of pictures and artificial effects. In addition, the DH is more like an exciting adventure than an account of school life. You can't delete any one detail in the whole plot without destroying the film. If the film is limited to 3 hrs, many scenes which is essential may get cut off by Warner, like the Life and Lies of Albus D. , Snape's memory, half of the final battle, the arguments breaking out between Harry and his friends which is crucial to hold the entire story tight together and even Godric's Hollow. I'm now a little worried that the seventh will become the best book and the worst film or just a showout for all those stars.


Last edited by Franklin Wang on August 14, 2007 8:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Arabella
Mrs. Fred Weasley
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Location: In my field of paper flowers
Posts: 15789

PostPosted: August 14, 2007 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

2-3 hours, on the upper side of that range.
_________________
Back to top
dontsayiquit
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 1039

PostPosted: August 14, 2007 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i would like it to be 4 hours plus that way they could include everything and make it the best film yet but they will probably ruin it.
_________________

Wand - 9.5" Ash Unicorn Hair
Back to top
amberluvsron
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Wherever Ron is...
Posts: 2286

PostPosted: August 14, 2007 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the same fears as you Franklin Wang.

I do agree with Arabella. It needs to be close to 3 hours long, but it probably won't be.
_________________
Back to top
Ron4ever
Fifth Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 519

PostPosted: August 14, 2007 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think that it should be at least 3 hours long, seeing as it is the last movie ever. i dont think people will mind if its a long one. plus, they should not cut anything from the final battle scene, because thats basicly what the whole 6 other books have been building up to. it would just be stupid to not make the last movie as long as it deserves to be.
_________________
Bloody Hell!!


banner made by harrys_gal
Back to top
DumbledoreEL
Third Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 4, 2007
Location: Cardboard Castle
Posts: 345

PostPosted: August 14, 2007 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would like them to follow as closely to the book as possible. In that case, as long as it takes.
_________________
Back to top
sheslikemagicx
Hogwarts Graduate
Ravenclaw Member

Joined: Aug 15, 2007
Location: London, England.
Posts: 1397

PostPosted: August 15, 2007 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say like 2-3 hours.
Like 3 hours at the most.
Because in that time you can fit all the main stuff and some smaller stuff in but its also not too long, cos little kids and stuff are gonna be watching this film too and they get bored.
Back to top
Ronfreak
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jun 9, 2007
Location: Flirting with Rupert
Posts: 1048

PostPosted: August 15, 2007 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah 3 hours is good. otherwise it'd be too long
_________________
Back to top
Lucy
First Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Posts: 187

PostPosted: August 17, 2007 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The longer side would be better, although I doubt they do that. They haven't so far and lord knows that OOTP could have used some more length to it.
Back to top
GinnyX
Mrs. George Weasley
Gryffindor Member
Moderator

Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 23236

PostPosted: August 17, 2007 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I definitely don't like the idea of it being a series. That would contain to many complciatons. I think it would be good at 3 to 4 hours, if there was a choice for that I'd have picked it. Smile
_________________

^courtesy of Arabella
Back to top
Ron4ever
Fifth Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 519

PostPosted: August 17, 2007 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, i thought maybe it should be a little longer than 3 hours maybe at the most
_________________
Bloody Hell!!


banner made by harrys_gal
Back to top
ravvy
Pub Bar Keep
Hufflepuff Member

Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Sam's Closet
Posts: 7929

PostPosted: August 18, 2007 6:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think it should be shorter because it was my least favorite book. i call it harry potter and the final cop out.
_________________

Quote:
I expect Potter will be reunited with dear Sirius before I am reunited with Lucius
PWN3D
Back to top
Ron4ever
Fifth Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 519

PostPosted: August 18, 2007 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ravvy wrote:
i think it should be shorter because it was my least favorite book. i call it harry potter and the final cop out.


How can you possibly think that??? granted the epilogue was very vague, i thought it was one of the best!!
_________________
Bloody Hell!!


banner made by harrys_gal
Back to top
Matt Ownz
First Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 154

PostPosted: August 19, 2007 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think that it will be longer than 3 hours.. dunno how much longer tho.. hopefully a lot.. so our final hours of harry potter can last as long as possible
Back to top
Nick
Second Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Location: Peru
Posts: 220

PostPosted: August 19, 2007 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

3 hours four hours are excessive
_________________

Back to top
Ron4ever
Fifth Year
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Jul 25, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 519

PostPosted: August 20, 2007 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick wrote:
3 hours four hours are excessive


Not really, when you consider how long the book is. and it is also the last, so they should make it longer so that they can show what happens and tie up all the loose ends
_________________
Bloody Hell!!


banner made by harrys_gal
Back to top
david_potter
Auror
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 20, 2007
Location: godrics hollow
Posts: 1847

PostPosted: August 21, 2007 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

it shuld be 4-5 hours long cos if it wos only 2-3 hours long half the story will be cut out!!!
Back to top
dboy84
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Location: Gryffindor common room
Posts: 1037

PostPosted: September 2, 2007 6:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think 4-5 hours, that would be good...Nice and long
_________________
Animagus:Troll (LoL!)

Back to top
teacakes
Mrs. Sirius Black
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 3513

PostPosted: September 2, 2007 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wish it was five hours but I'd be happy with 3½ if they don't cut things I think are important lol.
_________________
Back to top
Vasaver
Death Eater
Slytherin Member

Joined: Apr 21, 2007
Location: Cuddled up with Tom in the COS :)
Posts: 2826

PostPosted: September 2, 2007 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i would be happy up to four hours but once it goes over i my butt would hurt too much to even care about the movie... i mean the movies are good but not epic like lord of the rings... which even if they were ten hours long id still sit through it all.
Back to top
mynameiskerry_xo
Hogwarts Graduate
Slytherin Member

Joined: Jul 21, 2007
Location: philadelphia<3
Posts: 6120

PostPosted: September 2, 2007 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DumbledoreEL wrote:
I would like them to follow as closely to the book as possible. In that case, as long as it takes.


Exactly.
_________________
Back to top
Andrian_Potter
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 28, 2007
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1432

PostPosted: September 3, 2007 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well since it is the Last Book i think it should be 4-5 hour long that what i think
_________________

^ made by Andrian Potter
Back to top
Firewhiskey
Muggle
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: new jersey
Posts: 38

PostPosted: September 3, 2007 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it would be a crime to cut any of the book out of the movie! In that case i vote that it take as long as is needed to make it a great movie. Even if that be a five hour movie Wink
_________________


"chance favors the prepared mind"
Back to top
Andrian_Potter
Hogwarts Graduate
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 28, 2007
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 1432

PostPosted: September 4, 2007 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Fire Whiskey
_________________

^ made by Andrian Potter
Back to top
teacakes
Mrs. Sirius Black
Gryffindor Member

Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 3513

PostPosted: September 4, 2007 7:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Yup, I mean c'mon what are intermissions for?
_________________
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic