Harry Potter Forums

Posts: 50 · Joined: Jul 14, 2007 Location: Middle of nowhere Posts: 50

me for one I do think that she needed more since she only had like 5 lines in the whole movie but thats me what do you think?
_________________

Posts: 3250 · Posted: July 14, 2007 11:45 am Post subject:

yeah, really her only identification is when moody introduced her, and she got pissed and said 'dont call me nymphadora'. this may foreshadow that she has a reletively small role.
_________________

Posts: 50 · Joined: Jul 14, 2007 Location: Middle of nowhere Posts: 50

Posts: 24344 · Posted: July 14, 2007 4:59 pm Post subject:

Yeah, they could have at least threw in a "Wotcher, Harry!"
_________________

Breathing is optional.
Look, Bella, look.

Posts: 150 · Joined: Jul 13, 2007 Location: connecticut Posts: 150

actually....i thought Rons role was a massive let down. he barely had anything except for "who are you and what did you do with hermione granger?" well bravo ron anyone couldve done that

say...what does "wotcher harry "mean?

Posts: 194 · Joined: Jul 14, 2007 Location: New York Posts: 194

I was kinda disappointed with the Order's initial rescue of Harry. It took all of 30 seconds. It's like, the door opened, then they were outside, and then they were flying on brooms.

Where was the luggage? And why were they flying so low and close to boats? A flying car can be seen but flying broom sticks can't?

I know it's minor and done for effects but it kind of bothered me a little bit.

Anyway I've realized I've gone a little off topic. Yes I think Tonks should have had a bigger role, and would have had the rescue scene been a bit longer.
_________________

"Nice one, James!"

Posts: 117 · Posted: July 14, 2007 10:37 pm Post subject:

Tonks deserved more lines!
_________________
Set a man a fire, and he shall be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he shall be warm for the rest of his life!
"Dying is just natures way of saying 'Hey! Your not alive anymore!'"

Posts: 96 · Joined: Jul 12, 2007 Posts: 96

i don't think tonks should have had a bigger role, she was barely mentioned in book five...

Posts: 24344 · Posted: July 14, 2007 10:45 pm Post subject:

Posts: 150 · Joined: Jul 13, 2007 Location: connecticut Posts: 150

ohhh merci beaucoup!!!! i was thinking that everytime she saw harry she was saying "watch your step" which was ironic because she was usually the one doing the tripping... Laughing

but anywho...i feel that ron got shafted in the movie too...dissapointing. no matter....movie was excellent!!!!
_________________

Posts: 24344 · Posted: July 14, 2007 11:21 pm Post subject:

Posts: 50 · Joined: Jul 14, 2007 Location: Middle of nowhere Posts: 50

Posts: 3257 · Posted: July 15, 2007 8:17 am Post subject:

the whole movie sucked in giving everyone small roles.
_________________

Posts: 50 · Joined: Jul 14, 2007 Location: Middle of nowhere Posts: 50

yea but thats probaly something else that comes with a new director
_________________

Posts: 373 · Joined: May 7, 2007 Location: Sussex, UK Posts: 373

I thought Tonks was great!! But yeah a few more lines would have been nice ... I loved it when she was changing her face lol Very Happy

_________________
Forecast for tomorrow; a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!

<3 Harry x x x

Posts: 28095 · Posted: July 15, 2007 10:38 am Post subject:

i hate it when some characters are given like, what, 5 lines only when they obviously have more... 10 at least would be decent enough. bella as well only has 6 lines... but she did her role well.
_________________

I love my handsome Erik
Love

Posts: 24344 · Posted: July 15, 2007 10:55 pm Post subject:

Tonks and Belltraix were great in what they were given,that's for sure. So I think it makes me wish they had even more.
_________________

Breathing is optional.
Look, Bella, look.

Posts: 339 · Posted: July 15, 2007 11:00 pm Post subject:

I think Ginny got shafted the most!
She had a semi big role in Ootp and in the movie she had like 3 lines.
Reducto twice then the question to Harry.
Im disapointed a that
_________________
Harry and Ginny 4 ever!

Posts: 24344 · Posted: July 15, 2007 11:07 pm Post subject:

Posts: 339 · Posted: July 15, 2007 11:09 pm Post subject:

Yea for sure.
I was looking farward to alot of convo with Harry/Ginny
Tonks and other charaters.
it was a long movie but it seemed short with the lack on convos
_________________
Harry and Ginny 4 ever!

Posts: 43 · Joined: Jul 12, 2007 Location: The Spectrum Posts: 43

She should've had a more prominent role in the beginning of the film, but I do like the fact that they gave her a touch of clumsiness, like she is the in book. That made me feel a little better about the situation.

Posts: 339 · Posted: July 17, 2007 1:28 am Post subject:

Yea for sure!
_________________
Harry and Ginny 4 ever!

Posts: 6120 · Joined: Jul 21, 2007 Location: philadelphia<3 Posts: 6120

I was really surprised in how little of a part she had ): I loved her character in the books.
_________________

Posts: 2286 · Posted: September 4, 2007 9:41 pm Post subject:

Posts: 1508 · Joined: Aug 28, 2007 Location: Hogwarts Posts: 1508

i dunno
_________________

Harry Potter Forums

Harry Potter Community and Bulletin Boards