|
|
| Author |
Message |
mugglemom
Joined: May 22, 2007
Posts: 52
|
 Posted: May 22, 2007 3:28 pm Post subject: Acio Wand! |
|
|
When someone uses Expelliarmus!, what is to prevent the disarmed from immediately using Acio Wand! to be re-armed? What is more, wouldn't it be a great reversal to use Acio Wand! Expelliarmus!, and thus be now armed against an unarmed opponent?
I'm just wondering why the Greatest Wizard of All Time would be even slighly hampered by a 16-year-old's simple disarming charm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
halfbloodprincess
Joined: Apr 4, 2007
Location: Forever with Erik
Posts: 28168
|
| Posted: May 22, 2007 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place
_________________
I love my handsome Erik
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mugglemom
Joined: May 22, 2007
Posts: 52
|
| Posted: May 23, 2007 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
oh, yeah....that.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ThE_DaRk_MaRk
Joined: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 6409
|
| Posted: July 13, 2007 1:30 pm Post subject: |
ThE_DaRk_MaRk
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| halfbloodprincess wrote: |
| i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place |
Thats not true. In book 5 Harry dropped his wand when he was with Dudley and the Dementors were closing in, it was totally dark and HArry just said "Lumos" and his wand lit with out him holding it. Magic can be cast without a wand.
_________________
Join Reality Of It All!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
potter2hotter
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 96
|
| Posted: July 13, 2007 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ThE_DaRk_MaRk wrote: |
| halfbloodprincess wrote: |
| i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place |
Thats not true. In book 5 Harry dropped his wand when he was with Dudley and the Dementors were closing in, it was totally dark and HArry just said "Lumos" and his wand lit with out him holding it. Magic can be cast without a wand. |
yes but most magic does require a wand.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ThE_DaRk_MaRk
Joined: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 6409
|
| Posted: July 13, 2007 4:09 pm Post subject: |
ThE_DaRk_MaRk
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| potter2hotter wrote: |
| ThE_DaRk_MaRk wrote: |
| halfbloodprincess wrote: |
| i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place |
Thats not true. In book 5 Harry dropped his wand when he was with Dudley and the Dementors were closing in, it was totally dark and HArry just said "Lumos" and his wand lit with out him holding it. Magic can be cast without a wand. |
yes but most magic does require a wand.. |
I didn't say every spell can be cast without one. I was just trying to say it isn't impossible to do so...
_________________
Join Reality Of It All!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
potter2hotter
Joined: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 96
|
| Posted: July 13, 2007 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ThE_DaRk_MaRk wrote: |
| halfbloodprincess wrote: |
| i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place |
Thats not true. In book 5 Harry dropped his wand when he was with Dudley and the Dementors were closing in, it was totally dark and HArry just said "Lumos" and his wand lit with out him holding it. Magic can be cast without a wand. |
you said you can summon or disarm without a wand... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vlad
Joined: Jul 8, 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 179
|
| Posted: July 13, 2007 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lumos probably worked because it's most likely one of the simplest spells there are. Plus, Harry's fingers emitted a spark before the wand lit up. Just FYI (not that it's relevant). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oliver Oeilvert
Joined: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 44
|
| Posted: July 13, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| halfbloodprincess wrote: |
| i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place |
Hey I always wondered wouldn't it make sense to carry more than one wand, I know certain ones work better than others, but still a back up would be good most wizards have to replace the first one they get anyway like Ron and Neville. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JonasBrotherChic
Joined: Jul 14, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: July 14, 2007 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ThE_DaRk_MaRk wrote: |
| halfbloodprincess wrote: |
| i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place |
Thats not true. In book 5 Harry dropped his wand when he was with Dudley and the Dementors were closing in, it was totally dark and HArry just said "Lumos" and his wand lit with out him holding it. Magic can be cast without a wand. |
yes that did confuse me. The rules of magic can be really complicated when compared with other rules. I don't know about rules but you know what im trying to say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flamingmonkey923
Joined: Jul 7, 2007
Location: Wandering around in my brain
Posts: 4453
|
| Posted: July 14, 2007 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oliver Oeilvert wrote: |
| halfbloodprincess wrote: |
| i think you can only summon or disarm with a wand. if you are disarmed, there is no way you can accio your wand since you do not have your wand with you to cast out the spell in the first place |
Hey I always wondered wouldn't it make sense to carry more than one wand, I know certain ones work better than others, but still a back up would be good most wizards have to replace the first one they get anyway like Ron and Neville. |
That's a good point. If I were Harry, and inherited a large sum of money, I'd definitely do that.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Rules
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in
