|
|
| Author |
Message |
vandermorph


Joined: Mar 20, 2008
Location: In Heaven, Kickin back with Tonks
Posts: 3212
|
Posted: March 25, 2008 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GinnyX wrote: |
| vandermorph wrote: |
| GinnyX wrote: |
| vandermorph wrote: |
| If they are going to split the movie in TWO parts wouldnt a sensible blace to halve it be the middle? or would you want the first half or second half to go longer... Another way to do it would be to halve it at the end of the middle Chapter/Scene |
You need to stop a movie at a good point.. a point thatis a cliffhanger, but noting too dramatic. And you need to starta movie before there is a major conflict, not in the middle of one. Finding the perfect moment is tough....It's an art, really. |
Well i think the best part to do that is when they infiltrate malfoy manor to save Ollivander |
They don't infiltrate the manor, they get captured. They had no intentions of saving Ollivander, they were captured themselves. |
Sorry but i havent read the book since it was released in July last year so im hazy on the facts but you know what i mean dont you? _________________ Wand: 10' Rowan with Phoenix feather core
I LOVE TONKS *SIGH*
http://potter.ipbfree.com/index.php?act=idx , new look!! Join Now, Its free |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GinnyX



Joined: May 6, 2007
Location: I'm in a New York state of mind.
Posts: 22294
|
Posted: March 26, 2008 1:09 am Post subject: |
GinnyX
Report this post
| Items with prefix * are permanent. | Close |
|
|
| vandermorph wrote: |
Sorry but i havent read the book since it was released in July last year so im hazy on the facts but you know what i mean dont you? |
Yeah, I know what scene you mean, but infiltrated and captured are two totally different things and change the whole tone of a scene. So that's why I was just making sure what you meant. _________________
^courtesy of Arabella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vandermorph


Joined: Mar 20, 2008
Location: In Heaven, Kickin back with Tonks
Posts: 3212
|
Posted: March 27, 2008 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| GinnyX wrote: |
| vandermorph wrote: |
Sorry but i havent read the book since it was released in July last year so im hazy on the facts but you know what i mean dont you? |
Yeah, I know what scene you mean, but infiltrated and captured are two totally different things and change the whole tone of a scene. So that's why I was just making sure what you meant. |
Anyway i think that would be the best place to halve it as that is where the book is really cliffhanger if you know what i mean _________________ Wand: 10' Rowan with Phoenix feather core
I LOVE TONKS *SIGH*
http://potter.ipbfree.com/index.php?act=idx , new look!! Join Now, Its free |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
missLM


Joined: Feb 26, 2008
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Posts: 118
|
Posted: March 27, 2008 6:14 am Post subject: Re: Deathly Hallows in 2 parts; How long should they be? |
|
|
| Auror Monroe wrote: |
I hope the two parts, Part I and Part II, of Deathly Hallows are at the very least 2 hours long if not longer.
What do you think? |
Yeah I reckon...I want everything. It IS after all the last one and it would be nice if it had as much as possible in it unlike some- sorry did I say some- ALL of the previous films. _________________ Real, friikeh naughty |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JulieBaby83

Joined: Apr 17, 2008
Location: Tulsa,OK
Posts: 14
|
Posted: April 17, 2008 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I first heard about DH being split into two parts, I figured the whole point of it was to include as much detail from the book as is humanly possible. I'd be pissed if each part wasn't AT LEAST two hours long. I mean, come on, this is the end of the series, it has to be frigging epic. And I think it should stay as close to the movie as possible.
And for my money, I think they should split it at the scene where Harry, Ron, & Hermione are at Lovegood's house and Hermione's just gotten done reading The Tale of the Three Brothers. She closes the book and Xenophilus says "Well, there you are. Those are the Deathly Hallows."
Then *poof,* the screen goes black and the credits roll. That scene is right about halfway through the book, and it would make for an EXCELLENT cliffhanger ending to the movie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pulse


Joined: Apr 17, 2008
Location: N. PA
Posts: 30
|
Posted: April 17, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My guess is that probably they will be under 2 hours apiece - you can only extend a blow-by-blow so long...
But you-all MAY have a point.
& I agree with the poster above me (sorry don't have the name in front of me, har!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
..rose.weasley..


Joined: Oct 21, 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 833
|
Posted: April 19, 2008 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
mmm. at least 2 hours each. anything less will be very dispointing.
i intially thought it should or would be split at the ron leaving moment. but now that i think about it. the moment you (JulieBaby83) mentioned would be just as good. but its futher on in the movie. so it might unbalance the squencing, and movie length.
... and i dont want the first part to be like 2 and a half hours and the last part to be 1 and a half..it wouldnt feel right. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GirlInPinkSocks


Joined: Apr 5, 2008
Location: pink socks
Posts: 41
|
Posted: April 19, 2008 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As long as it takes to fit every single thing in. _________________ I love you.
"'Jiggery pokery!' said Harry in a fierce voice. 'Hocus pocus- squiggly wiggly'
'MUUUUUUM!' cried Dudley.
(Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chosen7one


Joined: May 4, 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 111
|
Posted: May 6, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
um ui hope total about 5 to 6 hours!! that would be amazing!! _________________ To the well-organized mind, death is but the next great adventure
-Dumbledore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arkemedes


Joined: May 26, 2008
Location: america
Posts: 35
|
Posted: May 28, 2008 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i want it to be super long. i mean its the last movie i don't ever want it to end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loch Monarch


Joined: May 4, 2008
Location: In my room reading the bible. probably Isaiah 40:31.
Posts: 1897
|
Posted: May 30, 2008 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
which is funny because the biggest book was goblet and it was like two hours _________________ yes, it is true i am in love with 78dlsjhs!!!!
Do you believe in magic?
Growing up is mandartory, maturing is optional |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hpgeek1334


Joined: May 29, 2008
Location: In the Crossroads of My Heart, Wondering Which Way to Go.
Posts: 1206
|
Posted: May 31, 2008 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
O.K. I think the 2 movies should be at least 2hrs. 45min. long or i too would have to personally CRUCIO Mr. Yates. and yes this would be his big chance at redemption after OotP. that movie was good but i was P.O.'d when they took all the good parts out and also @ christmas they didnt even show St. Mungos. i would've loved to see Lockhart insane more than just 5 sec. in CoS + i wanted to see Nevilles parents.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sweettahsin


Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Location: Alone with isabelle in the middle of Lake Ontario
Posts: 16528
|
Posted: June 1, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.50hrs each part _________________
I love Isabelle Lestrange!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cigaro

Joined: Jun 10, 2008
Location: Kings cross
Posts: 32
|
Posted: June 11, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think a manageable time would be 2 hrs and 30 mins for part one and 3 hours for part 2 _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Chickmagnet


Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1117
|
Posted: June 11, 2008 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They should be at least 3 hours each!  _________________
| teacakes wrote: |
| You can read people's minds? |
| hpgeek1334 wrote: |
| yeah why? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Remy


Joined: Jun 11, 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 47
|
Posted: June 12, 2008 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wasn't the point in making it into two films so that they wouldn't leave anything out? If so, I could never think that they would be less then 2 hours each. Perhaps 150 minutes each making it 5 hours in total. That would be more like it.
The future will tell. Hopefully it will be a saga to remember for many years to come. _________________ Three friends go into battle.
One is captured.
One flies away, the one that is left becomes a hero
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Isabelle Lestrange


Joined: Jan 24, 2008
Location: Alone with sweettahsin till we meet...
Posts: 6122
|
Posted: June 13, 2008 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to see each movie at least 2 hours each.
It would be great and gives us more then just an normal 1 hour and 20 minute movie.
When the fast part comes out, I will be packed in line first! _________________
I ♥ you sweettahsin! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tarantallegra


Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Location: Lost in the room of requirement *trips over diadem* ah, pretty
Posts: 1616
|
Posted: June 13, 2008 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For any of the Harry Potter or Pirates of the Caribbean, we get there about an hour early and we are usually 1st or 2nd in line. Then my brother and I race other people to the seats we want and win  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Chickmagnet


Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1117
|
Posted: June 13, 2008 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are the 2 movies coming out the same time or are they coming out in different times? _________________
| teacakes wrote: |
| You can read people's minds? |
| hpgeek1334 wrote: |
| yeah why? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tarantallegra


Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Location: Lost in the room of requirement *trips over diadem* ah, pretty
Posts: 1616
|
Posted: June 13, 2008 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's supposed to be like 6 months or a year between _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arabella


Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Location: In my field of paper flowers
Posts: 15122
|
Posted: June 13, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
part 1 19 November 2010
part 2 May 2011
is what imdb says _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Chickmagnet


Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1117
|
Posted: June 13, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats sucks. Some people might forget what happened in the last part
 _________________
| teacakes wrote: |
| You can read people's minds? |
| hpgeek1334 wrote: |
| yeah why? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Isabelle Lestrange


Joined: Jan 24, 2008
Location: Alone with sweettahsin till we meet...
Posts: 6122
|
Posted: June 13, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's only half a year apart surprisingly. We come from a big town with about over 50,000 people. Once we had to go into the second cinema to watch it. Because the first was packed. But the second was only half full gladly. Narnia was packed aswell. _________________
I ♥ you sweettahsin! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arabella


Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Location: In my field of paper flowers
Posts: 15122
|
Posted: June 15, 2008 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder if the first dvd will be out before the second part hits theatres. that could help with people remembering. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JJ Weasley


Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Location: Wondering about stuff...
Posts: 1255
|
Posted: June 17, 2008 10:39 am Post subject: Re: Deathly Hallows in 2 parts; How long should they be? |
| |